The son of Julian Assange's senior judge is linked to an anti-data leak company created by the UK intelligence establishment and staffed by officials recruited from US intelligence agencies. The United States Government appeals. A 'pure' political offence was defined as treason, espionage or sedition. There is little information publicly available about Arat, given Guernseys secrecy laws. People should be writing Lady Arbuthnot telling her that she is exposed, that she will be held accountable if anything happens to Julian and that she must remove Judge Baraitser immediately for her perpetual violations of British law. This cookie is used to measure the number and behavior of the visitors to the website anonymously. Mr Assange's case will now go back to District Judge Vanessa Baraitser, the original judge who assessed the American extradition request. Last October, Europe minister Christopher Pincher attended the forum in Edinburgh and, dialogue illustrates the breadth and depth of the relationship between the United Kingdom and Spain. 27-28 October 2021:US appeal hearing before the High Court Appeal. position, has been courting British ministers for years. Records the default button state of the corresponding category & the status of CCPA. to formally recuse herself from the Assange case. Recovering slightly, she stated firmly that delivery to custody can only mean delivery to the dock of the court, nowhere else in the room. A 'relative' political offence was an act which was normally criminal, like assault or vandalism, conducted with a political motive. The Biden Justice Department on Friday formally appealed a British judge's rejection of the U.S. request to extradite Julian Assange, confirming the new administration's intention to run with its predecessor's espionage charges against the WikiLeaks publisher despite warnings that the case endangers press freedoms around the world. The appeal will challenge the 2021 decision of District Judge Vanessa Baraitser who said that Assange could be extradited to the US but barred it on mental health grounds, agreeing that he could self-harm if sent to face trial. Lady Arbuthnot personally presided over Assanges case as judge from late 2017 until mid-2019, delivering two controversial rulings. Since the last ruling, overwhelming evidence has emerged proving that the United States prosecution against my husband is a criminal abuse. In more recent entries to the register of interests, the address is given by MPs as simply private. The MOJ officer stated: I can confirm that the MOJ holds the information that you have requested. This cookie is set by twitter.com. Lady Arbuthnot also benefited financially from another trip with her husband in 2014, this time to Istanbul for the British-Turkish Tatlidil, a forum established by the UK and Turkish governments for high level individuals involved in politics and business. This collected information is used to sort out the users based on demographics and geographical locations inorder to serve them with relevant online advertising. At one point, Joel Smith for the prosecution was attempting to get the attention of Judge Vanessa Baraitser to inform her that nothing could be heard in the court room. The reason for her attending a meeting. But, dont put a finger in the eye of the rest of the planet and expect to be applauded for your virtuous rigor on the world stage. District judge Vanessa Baraitser rules that extradition is barred under the 2003 Extradition Act because it is "opressive" (s.91). I suspect it is. These cookies track visitors across websites and collect information to provide customized ads. In the latest entries, the organisations address is listed only as private. The Assange case continues to set a legal precedent in being mired in opacity and conflicts of interest. The U.S. has 14 days to appeal the ruling, which has come after weeks of hearings at London's Old Bailey . Not corrupt. The reason for her attending a meeting described by Lord Arbuthnot as bringing MPs, business people, academics and artists together to discuss topical issues is not clear. The hope is the samizdat on the internet, where fine disobedient journalism is still practised. Articles copied from Draft Namespace on Wikipedia could be seen on the Draft Namespace of Wikipedia and not main one. District judge Vanessa Baraitser rules that extradition is barred under the 2003 Extradition Act because it is "opressive" (s.91). Blessings on you and all the other good folks out there. How incompetent would you need to be to attempt to take a photo and fail to do so? Declassifiedclarified that it wanted the list to include the date, the defendant, the charge and the judges decision. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Performance". Mr Assange is in prison while US authorities seek to extradite him to face trial on espionage charges. This argument has been made to the court in written form to which I do not have access. "Baraitser replied that Assange might pose a danger to the public. Removing advertising from your browsing experience is one of them - we don't just block ads, we redesign our pages to look smarter and load faster. "Julian's case is often compared with Dreyfus; but historically it's far more important. 14 March 2022:The Supreme Court refuses Julian Assange permission to appeal the High Courts decision. Makes you wonder if the biggest criminals arent embedded in judicial systems. She is present on the list of these on the judiciary website. Baraitser has also ruled that Wikileaks co-founder Julian Assange is to remain in prison when his jail term ends because of his "history of absconding". Although she is no longer personally hearing the Assange extradition proceedings, she remains responsible for supporting and guiding the junior judges in her jurisdiction. Theres surely something you could help with, right? Although having attended the annual event regularly since 2000, this was the first time Lord Arbuthnot recorded in his parliamentary register of interests the attendance of his wife. Someone on Twitter directed me to this draft Wikipedi a page, which was written concerning Baraitser back in October 2019 and rejected as a full article to be published on their page. This request, sent on March 31, 2020, was again rejected. All that is on the Wikipedia profile references limited information . This cookie is used by Cloudflare for load balancing. If you appreciate it and want to see us keep going then please consider contributing whatever you can. I accept that Mr Assange had expressed fears of being returned to the United States from a very early stage in the Swedish extradition proceedings but I do not find that Mr Assanges fears were reasonable, she said. A request under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) was sent byDeclassifiedto the Ministry of Justice (MOJ) on February 28, 2020 requesting a list of all the cases on which Baraitser has ruled since she was appointed in 2011. It. "The love we have for each other carries us through," she said. Sent sounds more extra-judicial. (Photo: Matt Kennard). If Patel is hit by a bus or a political force her party cannot withstand then she will NOT sign off on the extradition. The month following the Tertulias forum, in November 2014, Lady Arbuthnot went on another trip with her husband, this time to Istanbul for the British-Turkish Tatlidil, which paid the Arbuthnots 2,426 for flights and expenses. The main purpose of this cookie is targeting and advertising. "[8], By using the Wikispooks.com servers, you agree to its use of cookies, Document:Craig Murrays jailing is the latest move in a battle to snuff out independent journalism, Document:Eye Witness to the Agony of Julian Assange, Document:FBI Fabrication Against Assange Falls Apart, Document:The Armoured Glass Box is an Instrument of Torture, Document:Your Man in the Public Gallery Assange Hearing Day 2, Document:Your Man in the Public Gallery: the Assange Hearing Day 6, "Julian Assange extradition judge refuses request for delay", "The fluidity in which Judge #VanessaBaraitser delivered her ruling concerning the identity of #Assange's partner and children is almost as she had already had given it thought and written her ruling yesterday in her north London mansion, with a glass of white wine. Minister for Europe Sir Alan Duncan and Cabinet Minister David Liddington enjoy warm encounter with Spanish Foreign Minister Josep Borrell at 30th annual Tertulias in Malaga. This cookie helps to categorise the users interest and to create profiles in terms of resales of targeted marketing. The MOJ noted in response that it was obliged to send a reply within 20 working days. The cookie is used to store information of how visitors use a website and helps in creating an analytics report of how the website is doing. The Foreign Office has long taken a strong anti-Assange position, the political asylum given to him by Ecuador, and even, financially from another trip with her husband in 2014, this time to Istanbul for the British-Turkish. The judge, Vanessa Baraitser, dismissed the defense's argument, allowing the new material to be used by U.S. government lawyers in making their case. It was once a proud country until the U.S. started buying it up in the 60s. Assange stands no chance of justice in the UK, or any of the five ayes cuntries. Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. on Assange was made in February 2018 while he was a political asylee in the Ecuadorian embassy in London. The extradition requires two things in place; the general Extradition Act and the Extradition Treaty with the country or countries concerned. According to a report on Friday in the South African-based Daily Maverick, Lady Emma Arbuthnot attended, along with her husband Lord Arbuthnot of Edrom, all-expenses-paid secretive gatherings of. Arbuthnots role alsoincludessupporting and guiding district judges such as Baraitser and liaising with the senior judiciary and presiding judges on the cases they are ruling on. What's the least amount of exercise we can get away with? So to say that the extradition was not governed by the terms of the very treaty under which it was made, was to create a legal absurdity and thus an abuse of process. Good sleuthing, Terje. I accept that Mr Assange had expressed fears of being returned to the United States from a very early stage in the Swedish extradition proceedings but I do not find that Mr Assanges fears were reasonable, she said. That struck me, too, though I wondered whether it was a deliberate obfuscation. Vanessa is a local magistrates' Court Judge, and was elevated to such dizzy heights on 13th October 2011. Next to no other information is available about her in the public domain. Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. Miralis can only assume that the New South Wales . This cookie also helps to understand which sale has been generated by as a result of the advertisement served by third party. The case is sent back to the Magistrates Court with instruction to issue the extradition order. 4 January 2021: Westminster Magistrates Court discharges (throws out) the US extradition request against Julian Assange. The. annual meetings between the UK and Spain have been held since 1989 but the organisation has no public presence and provides no record of events. overwhelming evidence has emerged proving that the United States prosecution against my husband is a . Which is no crime on her part, but I suspect the expunging is not achieved without considerable effort. Her previous rulings on Assange cannot be revisited by the defence when she fails to declare a conflict of interest. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Analytics". Lord Arbuthnot can be seen standing next to her, likely having just introduced his fellow Conservative MP. 10 December 2021:The decision to discharge the extradition request is overturned by the High Court due to the United States Government issuing so-called diplomatic assurances to the UK Government. The data includes the number of visits, average duration of the visit on the website, pages visited, etc. She started to resemble something worse than a Dalek, a particularly stupid local government officer of a very low grade. This cookie is used by the website's WordPress theme. He denies any wrongdoing. British district judge Vanessa Baraitser delivered her ruling at London's Central Criminal Court, known as the Old Bailey. And if no photo was taken, how do they prove you were attempting to take one, as opposed to texting your mum? On this occasion, the request was not blocked. The cost: Press freedom is crushed, and dissent labelled mental illness. Well, its perfectly clear , what with the United States love of killingthat UK now stands for UNHINGED KILLERS. This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store and identify a users' unique session ID for the purpose of managing user session on the website. had been managed by the same person living at the addresses given by parliamentarians. The Perfected Grounds of Appeal concerning the United States Government include the following points: The Perfected Grounds of Appeal concerning the Secretary of State for the Home Department (SSHD) include arguments that Home Secretary Priti Patel erred in her decision to approve the extradition order on grounds of specialty and because the request itself violates Article 4 of the US-UK Extradition Treaty. This will ensure isolation and be as close to a secret trial as it's possible to get. This cookie tracks anonymous information on how visitors use the website. in 2012, at which time he was also chair of parliaments Defence Committee. If our countries survive with a legal system intact (debatable in US with BLM and Defund Police)- how can they claim hegemony when challenged by China if they are in violation of their own laws in such a publicly blatant way? The cookies store information anonymously and assign a randomly generated number to identify unique visitors. The Respondents are the Government of the United States and the Secretary of State for the Home Department, Priti Patel. . The chief magistrate has aleadership responsibilityfor the roughly 300 district and deputy judges across England and Wales. Every one of the charges against Assange was a pure political offence. The cookie is used to collect information about the usage behavior for targeted advertising. Judge Vanessa Baraitser is evidently hostile to Mr. Julian Assange and this is witnessed from several individuals attending the hearings at Westminster Magistrate Court as well as during the. The scale of obvious bribery to Arbuthnot, Baraitser, all officers in UK that did lap dog duty outside Embassy I can hardly fathom. At the start of a two-day hearing on Wednesday, lawyers acting for the US government asked London's High Court to overturn District Judge Vanessa Baraitser's January ruling that Assange should . Arbuthnot hears many of the most sensitive or complex cases in the magistrates courts and in particular extradition and special jurisdiction cases. WINNER OF THE 2017 MARTHA GELLHORN PRIZE FOR JOURNALISM. This cookie is set by linkedIn. Arbuthnot was then also a, of the Joint Committee on National Security Strategy and, In October 2014, Liz Truss, who was then Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA), attended the, meeting in Bilbao, alongside the Arbuthnots, Lidington and at least four other, Lord and Lady Arbuthnot spent two days at the event and received. This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Lady Arbuthnots husband is a key figure in the British military and intelligence establishment a highly controversial issue given that Lady Arbuthnot has made rulings in the Assange case and continues to oversee it as chief magistrate. Somebody suggested to me she might be a hologram, but I think not. According to a statement given toPrivate Eye, she stepped asidebecauseof a perception of bias, but it was not elucidated what this related to. Jan 4, 2021 (RT) Jubilant scenes have greeted Judge Vanessa Baraitser's decision not to extradite WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange to the US to face espionage charges at London's Old Bailey courthouse. This cookie is set by the Bidswitch. Come for all or part of the week! The Perfected Grounds of Appeal contain the arguments on which Julian Assange intends to challenge District Judge Vanessa Baraitsers decision of 4 January 2021, and introduces significant new evidence that has developed since that ruling.